/BrandolinisLaw
Brandolini's law often appears to be accurate, but it is actually false. In reality, it doesn't take much energy to combat bullshit at all, if you are properly prepared.
All you need is command of the truth and the courage to insist upon it.
Legitimate questions and legitimate differences of opinion are VERY different than deception, slander, ad hominem attacks, ignorance, stupidity, bullshit and outright hatred.
The "Fact Checkers," television pundits, mainstream media editors, government bureaucrats, and many others have been working overtime trying to create a false narrative about Ivermectin.
There is a MISinformation campaign to discredit Ivermectin’s use because it is an inexpensive readily available medication without a patent that makes vaccines and more expensive drugs unnecessary. The widespread use of Ivermectin to prevent and cure COVID-19 can cost large pharmaceutical companies and hospitals many billions of dollars in lost revenue.
It is also vital to note, as this report makes clear, Google's parent company, Alphabet, also owns two pharmaceutical companies that are partnered with the most powerful pharmaceutical companies who directly stand to lose billions of dollars if Ivermectin is widely used. Therefore, their search results are prioritizing Ivermectin MISinformation.
Bullshit criticisms only seem appropriate when they are mixed with a lack of information. I encourage you to review the information on this website and arm yourself with an abundant supply of the truth.
The Most Common
Erroneous Statements
That Are Being Made
About Ivermectin:
1. Ivermectin is dangerous.
Hundreds of billions of doses of Ivermectin have been taken over the past 40 years with an phenomenal safety record. Ivermectin is commonly given to children for the treatment of head lice. Over $1 billion dollars per year of Ivermectin per year is applied to animals in the United States alone.
On the contrary, hundreds of thousands of people have died from COVID-19.
Ivermectin is dangerous to the profits of those who oppose it.
Define dangerous.
Hundreds of billions of doses of Ivermectin have been taken over the past 40 years with an phenomenal safety record. Ivermectin is commonly given to children for the treatment of head lice. Over $1 billion dollars per year of Ivermectin per year is applied to animals in the United States alone.
On the contrary, hundreds of thousands of people have died from COVID-19.
Ivermectin is dangerous to the profits of those who oppose it.
Define dangerous.
2. Ivermectin hasn't been studied.
Only if you refuse to look at the more than 8,000 peer reviewed studies.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=ivermectin&sort=date
3. Ivermectin hasn't been studied for COVID-19.
Only if you ignore these:
63 published studies:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=ivermectin+covid19&sort=date
50+ Clinical Trials:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=covid&term=IVERMECTIN&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=
http://TheCompleteGuideToHealth.com/IvermectinClinicalTrials
If the above information is not enough to motivate someone to decide to provide a preventative and life-saving therapy for the world, then no larger number of studies will ever convince them, because they do not want to admit the truth.
4. Ivermectin has not been proven effective for COVID-19.
Actually, yes it has. A number of clinical studies are available on our research page. Laboratory studies showed that Ivermectin could reduce the viral load by 99.9%.
https://www.monash.edu/discovery-institute/news-and-events/news/2020-articles/Lab-experiments-show-anti-parasitic-drug,-Ivermectin,-eliminates-SARS-CoV-2-in-cells-in-48-hours
5. That was just a test tube study. There haven't been any clinical results.
Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people have avoided or recovered from COVID-19 worldwide due to their use of Ivermectin preventively or therapeutically.
https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectinresearch.html
6. The dosage used in the Monash study is a toxic level.
There have been several news reports and “fact checking" articles that attempt to discredit Ivermectin based on the Monash study on the grounds that the in vitro dosage is much higher than humans can tolerate without side effects. These reports are misleading.
Many doctors have successfully treated COVID-19 patients with a proven safe and effective dose that is significantly lower than the in vitro dose used in the Monash study.
Either by itself or in combination with doxycycline, zinc, vitamin C, and vitamin D3, Ivermectin has proven to be effective at the dosage that has long been approved by the FDA (200mcg/kg).
7. None of those studies have been the "gold standard" double-blind, placebo controlled crossover peer reviewed studies.
It is patently unethical and morally reprehensible to expect people to volunteer to participate in a study of a deadly disease in which they might receive a placebo instead of a treatment that could save their lives.
Already tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people have participated in "platinum standard" real-world studies where Ivermectin has been successfully administered to real people in the real world.
Instead of attacking the messenger, why not complain to "the powers that be" and demand that they appropriate the funds do the very clinical trials that you seem to "require?"
Your ignorance and cruelty are on clear display.
8. The FDA has not approved Ivermectin.
That is simply NOT true. Ivermectin is on the FDA's list of approved medications.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
(search for "Ivermectin") Every doctor in the United States has the right to prescribe any approved drug "off-label" for COVID-19 as they see fit.
9. The World Health Organization has not approved Ivermectin.
Ivermectin is listed as an essential medication by the World Health Organization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WHO_Model_List_of_Essential_Medicines#Anthelminthics
The World Health Organization has called for mass treatment with ivermectin: an underutilized public health strategy.
"It is time to capitalize on the full public health potential of ivermectin."
https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/82/8/editorial30804html/en/
10. That the FDA and the WHO haven't approved Ivermectin specifically for COVID-19.
That is because they have NO LEGAL AUTHORITY to prevent doctors from prescribing Ivermectin off-label for their patients. Ivermectin has been proven to be safe and was approved decades ago. No further approval is needed for doctors to utilize this amazing medication for patients around the world.
11. You can't just give a drug to everyone.
They are passing it out like candy in a number of countries around the world and they have been doing so for 40+ years. No one is saying that EVERYONE should take Ivermectin. Everyone should get informed and TELL their doctor that they want to discuss the specifics of their situation and consider Ivermectin as a preventative or therapeutic treatment.
12. Ivermectin can cause neurological damage in animals.
True. There are certain animals who should never receive Ivermectin. However, hundreds of billions of animals have been safely treated with Ivermectin, and their lives have been made much better by the removal of numerous parasites, bacteria, viruses and other problems. Last time we checked, most animals don't get COVID-19. Human beings tolerate ivermectin far better than most other drugs.
https://parasitipedia.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2344%3Aivermectin-tox-eng&catid=212&Itemid=2996&tmpl=component
13. Ivermectin is not safe for nursing infants if their mother takes Ivermectin.
True. However, most mothers who are suffering with COVID-19 should probably stop nursing and focus on their own personal health so that they can live and continue to care for their child. Mother's milk is preferable for an infants health, but dead mothers don't provide any milk.
14. Ivermectin is dangerous because it can interact with other prescription medications that people take.
You are absolutely correct that other prescriptions are deadly. Well over one hundred thousand people per year die due to adverse reactions to drugs other than Ivermectin. In fact, a number of medications actually reduce the effectiveness of Ivermectin, which would require people to increase their dose of Ivermectin in order to receive the same benefit as the recommended dose. That's why we recommend that everyone TELL their doctor to learn more about Ivermectin now, before it is too late.
15. It could be dangerous for children.
True. Everything in the world "could be" dangerous. You can die if you drink too much water or damage your lungs if you get too much oxygen. Hundreds of people die every year because they consumed aspirin. There are ALWAYS exceptions, but the studies show that Ivermectin is very, very safe. Would you rather be responsible for a child's death from COVID-19 because you refused to give them Ivermectin?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31344258/ Can you point to a study that backs up your claim?
16. I don't think that it will work.
Everyone is entitled to their informed opinion. If you have reviewed all of the information on this website and you disagree, that is your right. However, if you have only glanced at the information and are simply voicing an UNinformed opinion, that is also your right. Please look over our main page, review the research, read the articles and inform yourself before jumping to a hasty conclusion. Ivermectin has helped millions of people and billions of animals improve their health over the past 45 years. More recently, Ivermectin has helped tens of thousands of COVID patients around the world. To make a blanket statement such as "I don't think it will work" simply ignores a substantial body of evidence. Can you point to a study that backs up your claim?
17. The recommended protocol can cause a life threatening Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction.
True. But that usually means that the protocols are working. It is also true that "a healing crisis" may arise. In short, the problems arise when dead and decaying parasites, bacteria, viral particles and other organisms overwhelm the body's ability to remove them in a timely fashion. This is a legitimate concern, but it points to the fact that the protocol works. That is why we recommend that everyone follow these protocols while under the care and supervision of a qualified medical professional. Additional information is available here and here. Can you point to a study that backs up your claim?
18. Ivermectin isn't the end all be all. We simply need to do more testing.
The reliance on testing has been absurd. No one can afford to get tested every day. Every day that passes from the onset of symptoms to the receipt of a positive result on a SARS-COV-2 swab test gives the virus more and more time to multiply and go from a small problem to an exponentially larger problem. Fast response is vital.
You realize, of course, that studies have shown that people can have SARS-COV-2 in their lungs, blood, internal organs, digestive tract and stools but still test NEGATIVE on a nasal swab test. If treatment is based solely on testing, many people will unnecessarily suffer and die. Whether someone tests positive or exhibits the symptoms associated with COVID-19, early treatment that is designed to actually REMOVE THE VIRUS FROM THEIR BODY is a vital piece of ending the COVID-19 pandemic.
19. Ivermectin is just a "conspiracy theory."
How very true. Me, myself and I have conspired to encourage everyone to read the words, watch the videos and listen to the audios on this website in order to learn about Ivermectin. Ivermectin has been hailed as a wonder drug for more than 40 years and health care practitioners around the world have been using it to help thousands of people suffering from COVID-19. We DEMAND those same benefits for the people of America that are enjoyed by people in other countries.
20. If Ivermectin really worked, the mainstream media would have reported it.
Thank you for making my point. One has to ask, why hasn't the mainstream reported on the many thousand "platinum standard," real-life tests have been done by individual people around the world. Why hasn't the mainstream media reported on the efforts of doctors outside of the United States? What makes you believe that you should listen to generic health advice coming out of the mouth of a non-doctor who is merely reading a script from a teleprompter?
Tell your doctor about Ivermectin, because the mainstream media has dropped the ball and completely botched this.
21. Ivermectin is used in animals. Humans should not take animal drugs.
We are NOT telling people to take "animal drugs." The FDA has approved Ivermectin for use in treating the human diseases of strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis as well as lice and rosacea. Last time I checked, not to many ranchers were treating their farm animals' rosacea with Ivermectin.
22. The people who are promoting Ivermectin are somehow making money on it.
Your concern is valid, but your target is 180 degrees off the mark. A more pertinent question that you could ask is this: "Who might have a perverted financial incentive to hide information about a wonder drug that threatens the profitability of their business which profit enormously from the suffering of those who would be inexpensively healed by Ivermectin?"
23. I don't need Ivermectin. I take zinc and vitamin C, and that will help me heal if I catch the coronavirus.
Zinc can help stop viral replication but it does not perform the function that only Ivermectin is known to do, which is to block the entry of viral proteins into the nucleus of your cells. Once those viral proteins alter your immune response, a crisis is at hand. In such a crisis situation, when you are experiencing a cytokine storm, your immune system is going wild and your lungs are filling with fluids, at that stage it is true that 4 grams of liposomal vitamin C every 3 hours has been found to help calm the storm.
Do you have liposomal vitamin C in LARGE quantities? BUT THAT ONLY CALMS THE STORM, IT DOESN'T FIX THE PROBLEM. Only Ivermectin has been found to block the entry of viral proteins into the nucleus. Do you have some Ivermectin in your emergency kit so that you can take it immediately, if you need to?
You might not want to be quite so cocky. You might want to watch Kyle Carter's testimonial below...
24. I don't want to take an antibiotic because that can cause problems with the microbiome in my digestive system.
You are absolutely correct and restoring one's beneficial bacteria is a life long practice. However, SARS-COV-2 has the ability to enter the nucleus of human cells and once there it alters the chemical messengers that are sent to the host cell and out into the entire body. This messaging compounds are essentially "Fake News" that gives improper instructions to the immune system to act inappropriately. One commonly known result is the "cytokine storm" which can lead to rampant inflammation. While the concerns about the downside of antibiotics is certainly warranted, the benefits of supporting a deranged immune system when COVID-19 is threatening one's life must be weighed against the risks associated with antibiotics. We are NOT saying that anyone should take antibiotics prophylactically. Please review these pages: Prophylaxis and Be Prepared. Can you point to a study that backs up your claim?
25: Ivermectin isn't a "miracle cure" for COVID-19.
Actually, you are correct. It's not a "miracle" cure, because the manner in which it works is known. Many, many people around the world have "miraculously" recovered within days of taking Ivermectin after their health had been spiraling downward. Here are just a few testimonials. Can you point to a study that backs up your claim?
26. There are dangerous side effects associated with Ivermectin.
No, not really. If you can find even one death that was caused by Ivermectin after 45 years and many billions of dosages, please let me know. OTHER prescription medications kill over 100,000 Americans every year. OTHER prescriptions are the third leading cause of death in the United States. COVID-19 has contributed to the deaths of nearly 200,000 Americans so far. You are pointing the finger in the wrong direction. Can you point to a study that backs up your claim?
27. The treatment isn't safe for people who have compromised immune systems.
Getting COVID-19 is definitely not "safe" for people with compromised immune systems. If anything, people with weakened immune systems may very well benefit more than other people. Can you point to a study that backs up your claim?
28. There is no strong, robust evidence that Ivermectin provides benefits against COVID-19.
Other than the direct experiences of thousands of patients whose health was quickly deteriorating only to rapidly turn around and improve after taking Ivermectin, what kind of "evidence" are you looking for?
29. Ivermectin cannot be used "off-label" for conditions such as COVID-19 for which it has not been specifically approved by regulators.
You simply do not understand the law. Once a drug has been studied, determined to be safe, and subsequently approved by the FDA for use against any disease, then every doctor in America has the right to trust that proof of safety and prescribe it to their patients for other diseases. That is simply how it works in the United States.
30. Most completed studies into Ivermectin as a stand alone or combination treatment to treat COVID-19 have been done only in animals or test tubes.
Apparently, you have not taken the time to review the research literature.
31. Similar breakthroughs have proven to be ineffective.
You mean like Remdesivir, which costs thousands of dollars per dose and has had an absolutely horrible record so far? Relating the success or failure of another treatment in an attempt to cast doubt on Ivermectin is neither a logical nor reasonable argument.
32. People should not self-medicate.
People must realize that their health is their responsibility. Americans are being forced to take matters into their own health because the medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, media industrial complex has not served the American people well at all. We clearly advocate that people should consult with a knowledgeable, experienced health care professional who actually knows what they are doing rather than just "following accepted protocol."
Articles:
Crimes Against Humanity:
Censorship takes many forms. It also includes biased reporting that seeks to discredit a healing treatment by including outrageous claims regarding it's ineffectiveness, dangers or other issues that present the treatment in a negative way that is unduly slanted to the point that is becomes disinformation and propaganda.
When online media "covers" a story that they do NOT support, they generally pile on heaps of bullshit at the top of the article, add in all kind of distracting advertisements and click bait links to distract and delay the reader from getting down to the bottom of the page where the actual story is located.
They claim that they are doing this to be "fair and balanced." or to protect the public from unsubstantiated claims, but the real reason should be obvious to all.
A fine example of this is the following article published by the Miami Herald:
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/florida-keys/article245313450.html
We have no criticism of the reporter David Goodhue. We do have severe criticisms of the unnamed Miami Herald editors who insisted that the information provided by the clinical doctors about their successes using Ivermectin TO SAVE THE LIVES OF THEIR DYING COVID-19 PATIENTS was buried under an enormous pile of negativity.
The doctor's stories were located way down on the bottom of the page. Most people will not have the determination and focus to make it that far and will only see the propaganda on the top 3/4 of the page. While this may not technically be a "lie," it is an obvious manipulation of the truth.
The deception and lies that are skillfully intermingled with tiny snippets of truth in the websites below in a calculated way to create a negative narrative is NOT benign. Pure and simple, it is propaganda.
Lying and deceiving people to distract them from a powerful, safe and effective preventative and therapy is a crime against humanity.
Please review the facts that are provided on the other pages of this website so that you are able to see through the negative propaganda in the articles below.
When online media "covers" a story that they do NOT support, they generally pile on heaps of bullshit at the top of the article, add in all kind of distracting advertisements and click bait links to distract and delay the reader from getting down to the bottom of the page where the actual story is located.
They claim that they are doing this to be "fair and balanced." or to protect the public from unsubstantiated claims, but the real reason should be obvious to all.
A fine example of this is the following article published by the Miami Herald:
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/florida-keys/article245313450.html
We have no criticism of the reporter David Goodhue. We do have severe criticisms of the unnamed Miami Herald editors who insisted that the information provided by the clinical doctors about their successes using Ivermectin TO SAVE THE LIVES OF THEIR DYING COVID-19 PATIENTS was buried under an enormous pile of negativity.
The doctor's stories were located way down on the bottom of the page. Most people will not have the determination and focus to make it that far and will only see the propaganda on the top 3/4 of the page. While this may not technically be a "lie," it is an obvious manipulation of the truth.
The deception and lies that are skillfully intermingled with tiny snippets of truth in the websites below in a calculated way to create a negative narrative is NOT benign. Pure and simple, it is propaganda.
Lying and deceiving people to distract them from a powerful, safe and effective preventative and therapy is a crime against humanity.
Please review the facts that are provided on the other pages of this website so that you are able to see through the negative propaganda in the articles below.
World-leading parasite researcher Dr Carlos Chaccour says using the drug in fight against the virus could be ‘very, very harmful’
Melissa Davey
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/aug/13/what-is-ivermectin-and-should-we-be-using-it-to-treat-covid-19
Melissa Davey
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/aug/13/what-is-ivermectin-and-should-we-be-using-it-to-treat-covid-19
Unreliable data: how doubt snowballed over Covid-19 drug research that swept the world
Melissa Davey (Two-time offender)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/unreliable-data-doubt-snowballed-covid-19-drug-research-surgisphere-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine
Melissa Davey (Two-time offender)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/unreliable-data-doubt-snowballed-covid-19-drug-research-surgisphere-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine
Ivermectin is still not a miracle cure for COVID-19, despite what you may have read
Andrew McLachlan
https://theconversation.com/ivermectin-is-still-not-a-miracle-cure-for-covid-19-despite-what-you-may-have-read-144569
Andrew McLachlan
https://theconversation.com/ivermectin-is-still-not-a-miracle-cure-for-covid-19-despite-what-you-may-have-read-144569
No, Ivermectin Doesn't Cure the Coronavirus
Andrew McLachlan (two time offender)
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/no-ivermectin-doesnt-cure-coronavirus-167135
Andrew McLachlan (two time offender)
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/no-ivermectin-doesnt-cure-coronavirus-167135
Ivermectin Side Effects on Humans: Scientists Debate Coronavirus Cure
Caroline Burke
https://heavy.com/news/2020/04/ivermectin-side-effects-coronavirus-cure/
Caroline Burke
https://heavy.com/news/2020/04/ivermectin-side-effects-coronavirus-cure/
The approved dose of ivermectin alone not useful in treating COVID-19
Dr. Liji Thomas, MD
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200427/Ivermectin-alone-not-useful-in-treating-COVID-19.aspx
Dr. Liji Thomas, MD
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200427/Ivermectin-alone-not-useful-in-treating-COVID-19.aspx
FDA Letter to Stakeholders: Do Not Use Ivermectin Intended for Animals as Treatment for COVID-19 in Humans
Dr. Steven Solomon
https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/product-safety-information/fda-letter-stakeholders-do-not-use-ivermectin-intended-animals-treatment-covid-19-human
Dr. Steven Solomon
https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/product-safety-information/fda-letter-stakeholders-do-not-use-ivermectin-intended-animals-treatment-covid-19-human
Ivermectin Unproven as Treatment for COVID-19
Soren Rodning and Robert Norton
https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/farming/ivermectin-unproven-as-treatment-for-covid-19
Soren Rodning and Robert Norton
https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/farming/ivermectin-unproven-as-treatment-for-covid-19
UP adds ivermectin to its COVID-19 protocols without evidence that the drug works
Chahat Rana
https://caravanmagazine.in/health/uttar-pradesh-adds-ivermectin-to-covid-19-protocols-without-evidence-that-the-drug-works
Chahat Rana
https://caravanmagazine.in/health/uttar-pradesh-adds-ivermectin-to-covid-19-protocols-without-evidence-that-the-drug-works
Read about a new COVID-19 treatment study? It probably won't work
Liam Mannix
https://www.smh.com.au/national/read-about-a-new-covid-19-treatment-study-it-probably-won-t-work-20200406-p54hjs.html
Liam Mannix
https://www.smh.com.au/national/read-about-a-new-covid-19-treatment-study-it-probably-won-t-work-20200406-p54hjs.html
Warning issued as researchers reveal another potential treatment for coronavirus
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-04/monash-researchers-hopes-for-coronavirus-drug-treatment-warning/12121578
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-04/monash-researchers-hopes-for-coronavirus-drug-treatment-warning/12121578
VERIFY: What is ivermectin and what does FDA think about it as possible COVID-19 treatment?
Mauricio Chamberlin, Terry Spry Jr.
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/verify-ivermectin-fda-warns-against-using-for-coronavirus-treatment-covid-19/507-45353f19-2bde-4964-995e-f6df06baa775
Mauricio Chamberlin, Terry Spry Jr.
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/verify-ivermectin-fda-warns-against-using-for-coronavirus-treatment-covid-19/507-45353f19-2bde-4964-995e-f6df06baa775
Ssa asks to stop prescribing 4 drugs for Covid
Natalia Vitela
https://www.reforma.com/aplicacioneslibre/preacceso/articulo/default.aspx?urlredirect=https://www.reforma.com/pide-ssa-dejar-de-prescribir-4-farmacos-para-covid/ar2022661?__rval=1
Natalia Vitela
https://www.reforma.com/aplicacioneslibre/preacceso/articulo/default.aspx?urlredirect=https://www.reforma.com/pide-ssa-dejar-de-prescribir-4-farmacos-para-covid/ar2022661?__rval=1
If you trust Snopes to "check the facts" for you, may the farce be with you.
Can Ivermectin Cure Coronavirus?
Madison Dapcevich
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ivermectin-cure-coronavirus/
Madison Dapcevich
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ivermectin-cure-coronavirus/
TO ALL OF THE ABOVE AUTHORS:
Seriously, who do you think you are fooling with your bullshit?
PLEASE do your homework.
I call upon the authors of the above articles to rewrite and/or retract their blatantly deceptive and biased articles.
Those who perpetrate these lies may escape punishment on Earth, but you must realize that eternity is a really, really long time.
